Santharian Development

Santharian World Development => Santharian Artists Workshop and Resources => Topic started by: Koldar Mondrakken on 05 May 2003, 07:08:00



Title: -We have tribes- We have lots of them!
Post by: Koldar Mondrakken on 05 May 2003, 07:08:00
okay, somehow inspired by Curgann and Arti's note about Centoraurian borders I drew up all Santharian tribe borders.

I mainly orientated them on the description not on the existing map because the tribe maps does not recognize dwarven and elven territories at all atm. I used them as guide however when I'd to be inventive because I did not understand the territory desc or there was none at all.

Here it is:
www.thunder-productions.d...ia_pol.jpg

It's about the ancient distribution of land, of course.

Drawing it up I stumbled over problems one might not recognize when you just imagine your tribe:

-Many elven tribes are currently encircled by one sole human kingdom. While in some cases possible I think as humans and elves were enemies for quite some time their forests posed major obstacles for any human expansion. In various cases I'd assume that the human  territory would be smaller because of it.

-I couldn't decide whom to give Ximax. As Centoraurians are half nomads I somehow doubt they have much to do with mages and mountain ranges surrounded by water, two features the magic sickle has in plenty. Not sure but maybe an own realm or as part of the Kyranians it might make more sense.

-For a similar reason I'd give them the Heath of Jernais. When they're horse and cattle breeders the heaths would be a natural place to go, while Erpheronia would have to travel through the Thaelon, an elven forest, and is more urban which means they'd seek farm lands than plains.

-The Sophronians caused me a headache in their current territory. This tribe is pretty much torn apart by four elven tribes, two of them being very strong and dominant and a third, the Eophyrhim being known for not playing nicely with others. From my current feel this tribe would've been either broken apart into at least two realms, or settled more in the north away from the southern elven tribes, gaining some territory from the Eyelians around Onved instead.

-As the Maeverhim are pretty strong either, I guess that would've halted the Avenorian expansion north of their border, too.

-Was not sure if Barvados was originally Stratanian. If yes, as a seafaring nation, they might've build a port city at the east coast, too.

-The Caltharian border is rather feathered. With the Ancythrian Sea as a major obstacle I guess they would'nt have settled on the western side without building some major city. If Elsreth is Eyelian however, there wouldn't be any. Founding settlements with five other tribes around it would be however rather difficult then.

-The Isles of Ram are currently rather far off and with only Veltins as an Erepheronian port in the east, a city far off the homelands of the Erephoranians, I#m not sure they'd settle there. Maybe that would be more a place of the Caltharians who would gain some Erepheronian territory northward with Veltins, too.

- I was unsure whom to give Alvang and the various islands in the west. As with Ximax I was unsure if Centoraurians would colonize islands.

-Centorauria currently sounds a bit small when the Aerelian Lakes are their southern border. Maybe they get more from Kyrania and the southern border is somewhere north of the Ilian plateau?

-I draw the Shendar in with lots of land but as they're nomads I guess the Stratanians would claim all the lands their caravans go through. But as a population they'll stick to the coasts and cities, I think.

-Oh, when I gave dwarves some coastal strips this was mainly because it looked like land none else would really settle in anyway because it seemed far off.


All this are only my thoughts on it, partly not knowing what the various writers planned for certain tribes. I mainly looked for the tribe's homelands, their preferences and major natural borders that'd stop their settling. From these thoughts the above statements and questions arose.

But I think such a map with _all_ tribes would be helpful  development-wise, even if it stays a work in progress when different people shuffle over which city belongs to whom. :)  


Koldar Mondrakken, Knight of the Moonlight

Edited by: Koldar Mondrakken at: 5/4/03 3:10:17 pm


Title: Re: -We have tribes- We have lots of them!
Post by: Ta`lia of the Seven Jewels on 05 May 2003, 16:35:00
Isn't Bardavos a free town?I don't think that it belongs to the Stratanian Kingdom. It is a town of artists maily, and would not need a port as urgently as a seafaring nation. They could use Dasai as well - or Varcopas.
I don't know either, if we can didvide the Shendar and the Stratanians so cleanly(?). The Stratanians are part Shendar and so the shandar will have their hands in all important political things as well - somehow. The territory in the south is too large, the Yar'Dangs are maily desert and Shendar guides are needed to cross them, but the stratanians can claim them nevertheless.
Maybe they even count the whole desert to there kingdom, though they can#t use it without the help of the Shendar.
Have to reread some parts--later.

Btw, nice map, a lot of work! :-)

Edited by: Talia Sturmwind  at: 5/4/03 11:37:46 pm


Title: Re: -We have tribes- We have lots of them!
Post by: Silfer Darkflare on 05 May 2003, 17:13:00
Koldar: Ximax is pretty independant as well, I guess, as the Ximaxian mages are very well capable of defending the eleven towers form any wishing to claim them as their territory.




Title: Re: -We have tribes- We have lots of them!
Post by: Bard Judith on 05 May 2003, 18:31:00
The map is beautifully done!

A couple of problems with the dwarves:


a) they tend to monopolize the mountain regions in their area, but belowground. However, since the area can't be farmed productively, humans don't often 'use' the aboveground (just the odd hunter/ranger/trapper, etc.) and dwarves put their well-protected crop-farms in high mountain valleys and fastnesses which can only be reached by tunnelling.  

b)  they spread out underground.  What 'belongs' to an elven or human tribe above the surface only goes root-deep, as the dwarves say, and they tunnel where they want.  Thus the area of their underground territory is more expansive than indicated...

How this affects the map is:  it may not be possible to show the actual extent of dwarven claims without very confusing overlapping and dotted lines.  

A better trick would be to have two or three maps, one showing human claims and elven, (or a separate one for elven?)  and one showing dwarven.  Brownies, orcs, gnomes, and other smaller pockets of races can be marked on third or fourth maps depending upon the size of their claims.  When the page loads, only the greyscale map shows.  Then mousing over a list on the side would 'flash' up the appropriate map and legend...

Don't know if this is possible, and in the meantime this version is both very helpful and beautifully executed, with its shaded mountains and edges...

Thanks!



Title: Re: -We have tribes- We have lots of them!
Post by: Koldar Mondrakken on 06 May 2003, 02:08:00
Generally: That's the reason I drew the map. E.G. Ximax is currently seen as part of Centorauria but I'm not sure if that still fits to the tribe. Similary I tried to point out ither facts that currently sound weird to me.


@Talia: Hmmm... I thought that the Stratanians moved into the place from the north and stay in cities but the entry says otherwise. So Stratanians and Shendar have actually a good relationship? The same applies to Barvados as it does to Ximax. It is currently referred to as part of Stratania in the ancient kingdom maps, thus I gave it to them!

@Silfer: Thus I executed this map. Currently Ximax is considered Centoraurian territory but I also doubt this to be the case. But I think Curgan also has a say in  this. ;)

@Judith: Well, I assumed that any mountain range populated by dwarves won't be accessible by other races even when dwarves live above ground. I'd still assume that they want to keep control of the areas around their cities even if they don't use it in a productive way. Just like not wanting someone to dig somewhere without their permission or chop wood they might need for their construction sites or the smitheries.
They wouldn't do much like populating the area but they'd lay claim on all the hills they think containing raw materials they want, no?

Oh, and anything but the colours and tribes name is the original Santharian map from Arti, I just abused it by mercilessly painting over it! ;)  

Edited by: Koldar Mondrakken at: 5/5/03 9:12:23 am


Title: Re: -We have tribes- We have lots of them!
Post by: Koldar Mondrakken on 07 May 2003, 07:08:00
Oh, I didn't find any tribe reference to the darkelves who once lived in the Shivering Woods not even a name!


Koldar Mondrakken, Knight of the Moonlight



Title: Re: -We have tribes- We have lots of them!
Post by: Viresse on 07 May 2003, 13:30:00
*waves hands*
If someone's looking for a drow-er, Y'all can ask me...  


*pokey de Viresse at viresse@santharia.com* - Adventures of Caelereth Administrator
The Santharian Dream - Home sweet Home...



Title: Re: -We have tribes- We have lots of them!
Post by: Artimidor Federkiel on 07 May 2003, 13:54:00
I definitely need to talk with Curgan about Ximax and Centorauria, cause of course it needs to be Centoraurian territory, a territory which gained independence in the course of time probably. Also the borders of Centorauria in the Curgan concept and on this map are problematic, though partly possible at earlier times, as the main kingdom borders are already defined, question is only the time this snapshot was made.

A map showing the exact migrations of men, dwarves, elves etc. with dates and borders as well as the changing of borders in the course of time is definitely necessary as soon as possible, though personally my time is too limited for such an endeavour.


The Santharian Dream Webmaster - Let Fantasy Dreams come true!
World Development Admin - The Forum where Worlds are born...



Title: Re: -We have tribes- We have lots of them!
Post by: Koldar Mondrakken on 07 May 2003, 16:13:00
The nasty part is that we have more than two dozen tribes that would interact here, even if we assume that elves and dwarves will stay pretty stable in their realms the eight human tribes are still enough.

Eventually one could be mean and size down the amount of tribes with ambition and the blood to write history (with their blood or someone else's)?

I guess in a whole one could size that down to Erepheronia, Centorauria and Kyrania who had some territorial ambitions at one time or another and Avennoria with a centralistic government.

From Eyelians and Caltharians we read that they don't bother much about a strong kingdom so maybe the term "kingdom" is more a definition of a region than a real centralistic state with troops and stuff?

At least about the three nations that will become Tharania we have some history...

But given the two first Sarvonian Wars I fear one would need some info about elven politics as well. :

BTW: How fix are the ancient kingdom maps on the site in the sense of how representative are they?Meaning have their borders a backthought(like a certain city should belong to a certain tribe) or did they occurr on random?
Would be helpful to know, I'm afraid.

PS Sorry for opening Pandora's Box for you once in a while, Arti. :  



Title: Re: -We have tribes- We have lots of them!
Post by: Ta`lia of the Seven Jewels on 13 May 2003, 14:49:00
To the south: without rereading the entries, I would say part of the people came from the north (Drafas Tristin f.e.) a lot later than the original Shendar. The Shendar themselves split up in those who settled on the coast and intermingled with the people from the north, forming the Stratanians. The relations between the Shendar and the Stratanians are forced to be more friendly than hostile, because they depend on each other to a certain extent. Maybe the Shendar tend to look a bit down onto the "week" townfolks who cannot survive in the desert without help?? I think the Stratanians can claim the desert for their territory as well, because their settlements(Strat, talambath, Varcopas) are located around on the coast, nobody else can claim this desert for themselves and the Shendar are not interested in claiming their own kingdom.
I don't know how it works or worked in Northern Africa - there were colonies declared and rights assumed without asking the Tuaregg if this is their country or not?



Title: Re: -We have tribes- We have lots of them!
Post by: Wren on 14 June 2003, 04:54:00
I guess I do the politics. Tell me wht you want to know.

As for the Sopheronians..... Your estimation sounds about right. The Tetherhim and the Quaelhoirhim are both powerful tribes in their own right, and not always to nice to each other, nevermind their human neighbours.

Remeber prior SW1 the Ziephyr was more extensive than it is now. The Quallian was orriginally part of the Ziephyr and became a seperate forest as a result of deforestation and fire during the war, followed by a series of large floods and landslips unti the Theahevil river regained its equilibrium.

Looking at the entry it suggest to me that the human tribe were a divided one, they could easily fit a sort of Gaulish set up - one race made up of indvidual and independant sets.

And looking at the history section, I get the intese impression that all attacks on the Quaelhoirhim were conducted by other human leaders, the Sophronians would have both the most too gain and the most to loose in a war with the elves.

Any help?


Anodd yw dwyn dyn oddiar ei dylwyth



Title: Re: -We have tribes- We have lots of them!
Post by: Koldar Mondrakken on 14 June 2003, 08:49:00
I guess Gaulish culture is possible but does not explain well the territory they inhabit at the moment. They're scattered geographical. It's a bit a weak position for them. But currently don't know how we could resolve this logical.

On a different note. Is there any explanation why Santhala became the capital of Santharia? The Eyelians don't look very urban and the Santharian kings originated from Erepheronian kings. You usually place your capital into your heartland not into the periphery. It's kind of weird to leave those lands where you have your most loyal followers. I guess this decision would need a good tale. :)

In a whole I think we should give the elves a bit more territory back in these ancient times. Currently their ínfluence is coming a bit short with the borders of the human kingdoms being drawn right through their lands! Especially the Zeiphyr as you've described would form a rather big elven domain in the southern region.

In a whole  bit of a problem is that things get a rather cluttered as there does not seem to be enough land for everyone. Guess we might need to adjust territories and tribes a bit to "clean" it up a bit.

Just some thoughts.




Koldar Mondrakken, Knight of the Moonlight



Title: Re: -We have tribes- We have lots of them!
Post by: Artimidor Federkiel on 15 June 2003, 01:09:00
There already exists the story behind the foundation of Santhala (at least a larger part of it), see Wren's story in the Library "The Last of the Axhái":

"Santhala was constructed to hide the prison of the Móh’hái. The town was constructed by Saban Blackcloak to house the dark mages, loyal to himself, that held the Móh’hái enchained deep down in the bowels of the earth. At first it does not seem like an obvious choice for a hiding place, right in the middle of a populated country, but think about it! The creation of Santhala was in fact the ideal hiding place for the Móh’hái. The Móh’rónn, posing as the true saviour of the darkfriends was embarrassed when the Móh’hái, close in thought to Coór himself, would not do his bidding. The Rimmerins Ring was local to Alvang, it was secluded, he did not need his mighty army to take the creature there. And once imprisoned far below the mountains, the darkfriends did not ever question, nor wonder at the Móh’hái’s disappearance, just as no one questioned mages living in a small isolated settlement. All Caelereth knows that mages are curious types at the best of times! And these mages were the first of... the Guardians.

Soon though, the town began to flourish of its own accord. The land was good and productive, the Yellow river was a life giving vein that allowed easy transport, and the city was the ultimate in defensive sites, enclosed in the Rimmerins Ring.

Then, Saban went down the volcano Hčckra, and left Caelereth forever. Worried about what the Móh’hái would do to its tormentors and trappers, and without Saban to protect them, the mages kept it imprisoned out of fear, never breathing a word of its existence to anyone outside their circle. And so the irony came to be that the mages who once had worked for Saban, gradually became the protectors of the kingdom that grew out of his defeat, an irony that would not have been lost on the Móh’rónn, I am sure.

Thus the capital of the New Santharian Kingdom, Santhala, the symbol of freedom, justice and unity under the great King Santhros was built on what the Móh’rónn himself had created. Santhala was built on a secret and a lie."


Santhala then is destroyed for these dark reasons during the first centuries of the Santharian era (Wren's story starts in 299).


The Santharian Dream Webmaster - Let Fantasy Dreams come true!
World Development Admin - The Forum where Worlds are born...

Edited by: Artimidor Federkiel at: 6/14/03 9:11 am


Title: Re: -We have tribes- We have lots of them!
Post by: Wren on 15 June 2003, 15:13:00
It wouldn't need to be the capital straight away, and I am rewriting that chapter, so I can change it.

The way I see it, Santhros wants to make a united kingdom., draw a line under the kings of Old and their seat in Voldar.

He might also want to put himself on a different level to King Thar - by making his capital in the Midlands, on Santharia's most major river he shows that he Unites all the tribes - Not just the northern ones as Thar did. A symbol of a new Southern Sarvonia if you would.

Rimmerins ring offers you the Perfect defensive site. If you fear uprisings from the Eyelians, you can easily use this site to control the surrounds, but to be honest, by the time Santhros is crowned I'm not sure this is an issue. Your at the heart of the country, the perpiheries become regions already loyal to you.

There are also strategic advantages I suppose. You want to keep an eye on the two largest Elf tribes, build a City on their doorstep.

Considering that Santhros is soo vital, I think it's shoking he remains so shrouded in mystry *looks at Arti* Get writing boy.


Anodd yw dwyn dyn oddiar ei dylwyth



Title: Re: -We have tribes- We have lots of them!
Post by: Artimidor Federkiel on 16 June 2003, 00:58:00
I guess Wren's reasons are quite logical and well thought up. Also the times of Thar are long gone when Voldar was the capital of the north, and Santhala definitely lies very central and is wonderfully protected by the Rimmerins Ring (if the opportunities to access are guarded pretty well, that is).

And yeah, Thar and Santhros would need entries, I know, I know. Unfortunately there are other projects which draw away my ressources, namely the Nepris game project at the moment, where we need to make as much progress as we can handle till Humangus leaves for the military, so that we know where what kind of problems lie and what we should do against them till autumn. Maybe I can quench one of these two important kings in sometime, but no promise on that soon.

Hmmm... Maybe Thar would be even something for Curgan, as he has married him to Curogana... Need to ask him...


The Santharian Dream Webmaster - Let Fantasy Dreams come true!
World Development Admin - The Forum where Worlds are born...

Edited by: Artimidor Federkiel at: 6/15/03 9:02 am


Title: Re: -We have tribes- We have lots of them!
Post by: Koldar Mondrakken on 16 June 2003, 02:52:00
Eh, partly ok but you should consider what loyal people do when you defy them. :)  
Usually a capital is founded within the core of the most support because it is the best defensive position when there are thousands f citzens who identify themself with the kingdom. Geographical position is secondary and you don't need to found a capital somewhere where it can be easily attacked. For that purpose you've armies and castles.

Anyway the problem is more that it does not quite fit to the Eyelians who are not described as very developed. You don't put your capital among "barbarians´" when your own people are more civilized. Just imagine where the whole trade goes, usually to the highly developed regions not to backwater lands.

It's more that Santhala should imo have more rational reasons to found a capital somewhere in the wilderness far of the erephorian power centres of Voldar  and Nyermersys.

The power distribution does not feel right to me, just yet. If that sounds too weird I'll try to explain further. ;)  


Koldar Mondrakken, Knight of the Moonlight
 Weakness is strength. Hope is life.

Edited by: Koldar Mondrakken at: 6/15/03 12:54 pm


Title: Re: -We have tribes- We have lots of them!
Post by: Wren on 16 June 2003, 07:59:00
Aye - but the capital ends up being Santhala, Santhros chooses it. There may have been problems in his choosing it, but he did anyway.....

So instead of looking for problems we have to look for the positives that would have influenced his desicion.

Stop making my life awkward will you! :P


Anodd yw dwyn dyn oddiar ei dylwyth



Title: Re: -We have tribes- We have lots of them!
Post by: Koldar Mondrakken on 16 June 2003, 08:47:00
That is what I intent ... doh... ;)

I mean, it is for me not the question that Santhala became capital but imo we should be aware to create several incidents why it was chosen to be the one. It could mean that the human tribes had a great sanctuary there where they meet during the Sarvonian Wars to forge their alliances for their common cause or the Eyelians are a far more powerful tribe than we know. It just means that we should make some adjustments so it makes in a way more sense than just "That is the capital because Santhros said so". Actually we could say so when we wouldn't develop Caelereth in such detail but how things are I fear we have to try to take various things into account and engineer things in a way making Santhala a good choice as a capital.

And to make things awkard for you I fear another problem is also a bit the province borders as they ignore historical and ethnical ties to a great degree. While we can say that Santhros intended right that one must just imagine what problems would arose when we slice France and Germany (or England) in halves and merge it with other nations. It is in a way an artifical Balkanization and that would be rather unstable. Strange enough imo the problem there lies more that we have so few provinces because many small ones would be to centralize government while few big ones will just include many citizens of different heritage and race and thus would have a greater potential of conflict.

Hey, I made this thread because of such questions not to hassle someone but to maybe to just talk about beforehead because this can create a hell lot of inconsistencies the more detailed things get.

So I don't try to make life awkward for you, just think it important to make the world consistent.


Koldar Mondrakken, Knight of the Moonlight
 Weakness is strength. Hope is life.



Title: Re: -We have tribes- We have lots of them!
Post by: Artimidor Federkiel on 16 June 2003, 12:14:00
a) Eyelians of the Santhros era of course are much more developed than Eyelians who settled thousands of years before in Sarvonia.

b) The power concentration to the north is definitely not good for Santhros, as he needs to show unity - and visible signs of unity. Voldar has been the great capitol for thousands of years, and a new era has to start.

c) The geographic aspect therefore is extremely important to have a counterweight to the power concentration up north, cause provinces far off often have a tendency to claim their indepenence when the hand of the king doesn't reach far enough. The north is in firm hands of the Erpheronians (Tharian kingdom), but the south needs to be stabilized.

d) The south also needs to be economically revived as the north is pretty much ahead. With a semi-occupation of the south in order to help people there with economical know-how and a better organized centralized trade system, people will see the advantages much faster.

e) Santhros does not really occupy a kingdom. He is with the people. He is a king of the people, and he goes there where the people are. Not to demonstrate power and oppress them, but to help them. Therefore Santhala is a communication center for the many different tribes of the southern region.

f) As Santhala was in fact another town before it became Santhala, you can still place sanctuaries etc. and whatever makes the city attractive in there.

g) And everything else Wren mentioned as well (good defensive position) etc.

And that the province borders contradict the old kingdom borders is intentional as well. The old kingdoms were split into further parts (duchies etc.) and the reorganization draws the border lines between these dutchies differently, but the provinces do not have as much power as the ancient kindgdoms (at least not in the initial concept at the time of Santhros) and so these divisions are mainly of administrative importance.


The Santharian Dream Webmaster - Let Fantasy Dreams come true!
World Development Admin - The Forum where Worlds are born...

Edited by: Artimidor Federkiel at: 6/15/03 8:14 pm


Title: Re: -We have tribes- We have lots of them!
Post by: Koldar Mondrakken on 16 June 2003, 14:29:00
I'm referring to the Eyelian tribe entry. They don't sound too established, still clanbased and stuff.

And about the power cocentration. It is not good nor bad, it is just there and cannot be simply ignored.

You have to think Santhros founded his capital in the center of Santharia. But when the power centers of trade and military lie in the north he's miles away from the most important territories of the whole kingdom. The farther the king is away from them the more independant they'll behave and other than the poorer southern regions they have the wealth to pay for this independance. Abandoning his homeland that way would definetely cause more than just a little hatred among the people there. They would be more likely to turn their back to a king that ignores his own people than the southern ones would do when they join him by free will.

Quote:
Santhros does not really occupy a kingdom. He is with the people. He is a king of the people, and he goes there where the people are.


When we take the amount of large cities as a slight indication that's the North.

Thus Santhala needs to be of tremendous importance to be more important than your own homeland.

How about that. The three southern woodelf tribes are the strongest and definetely the ones with most contact with humans. Maybe they demanded that the free races would have their governmental council closer to their own homes and not somewhere north. Still has a bit the taste of the Erepheronians feeling mistreated as the most important driving power in Santharia. Thus giving Santrhala further historical importance in the past would make it more explainable why that would be the place of choice for government.


About the provinces I meant. You've eight kingdoms and eight provinces but the provinces ignore the original borders of the kingdoms entirely (splitting some kingdoms in halves while merging others together). From an ethnical point of view that's not that good and from an administrative point of view you've not resolved much because you need as many province capitals as before with the kingdoms.


I know these might be annoying details but they get pretty important easily.


Koldar Mondrakken, Knight of the Moonlight
 Weakness is strength. Hope is life.



Title: Re: -We have tribes- We have lots of them!
Post by: Koldar Mondrakken on 18 June 2003, 05:40:00
Defensive position is not an important issue for a capital, you won't place it somewhere where your subjects will try to kill you anyway.

Quote:
There are also strategic advantages I suppose. You want to keep an eye on the two largest Elf tribes, build a City on their doorstep.


That's a good reason to crush it if it's in the way because some stupid moron started trouble with elves. :)

No I think it's the most logical when it were the elves that wanted the capital of a united kingdom out of the old walls of the Erepheronians and on neutral ground. Are the Eyelians known as Elffriends maybe? The whole United kingdom idea would be void if elves and humans do not agree here. It would as well if the elves stay unimpressed to the whole idea so they need to do some things to "guide" the humans on the right track. And in Voldar the Ererpheronian kings started two devastating wars between the two races...


Koldar Mondrakken, Knight of the Moonlight
Weakness is strength. Hope is life.



Title: Re: -We have tribes- We have lots of them!
Post by: Wren on 21 June 2003, 14:37:00
Elves and humans are united and for the most part friendly at this point though....

If you want to make a united kingdom why not go to a part of Santharia where there is a dwarven population (west), Hobbits (Elverground) and Elves?

My point was that it allows you to keep an eye on these, to a certain extent, autonomous elements of the Kingdom, and to make sure they don't act outside the interests of Santharia either economically or in a military sense. Build a capital on the doorstep of all the major races and you can keep yourself in the loop as to what they are up to!


Anodd yw dwyn dyn oddiar ei dylwyth



Title: Re: -We have tribes- We have lots of them!
Post by: Koldar Mondrakken on 23 June 2003, 09:52:00
The way you describe it it wouldn't be a very nice step by Santhros to put his capital there, more a provocation to have the elves under close surveillance. :

We have elves and humans both being rather independant and different in their thinking. You won't get these guys into one kingdom if it is not in the mutual interest of both and thus the elves would want the Santharian king under close surveillance and not the other way around. Would elves really trust a human king when they couldn't ensure that his decision would at least have some elven sense in it? In Voldar a human king could do as he likes because he is in the heart of human territory. Elves wouldn't like that idea, I think.

In that matter Santhala is far more neutral for a united kingdom of sorts. From Santhros' point of view it might have been also your point why he did so but do you think you could sell 'to keep them under close control' as a positive aspect to other races?

Also being friendly to each other does not mean to be willing to give up influence. That's the current dillemma of Europe.Of course we are all friends, that's not the problem, but the hard work is currently to convince each other that giving up independance in certain aspects does not mean giving up your own interests.



Title: Re: -We have tribes- We have lots of them!
Post by: Koldar Mondrakken on 23 June 2003, 10:00:00
As you can see there's no trouble why maybe Santhros did choose Santhala but there need to be also reasons why the other factions do so because Santharia is/was and never will be an absolutistic monarchy. That would hardly work even if Santhros and all kings after him were "full-blooded" halfelves. :)

btw: I'd see it good if the elven Ránn would also reside in New-Santhala with the Santharian king, otherwise you'll always end up with two power centers, one for the humans and one for the elves. Don't know if that is planned anyway though. ;)